
Cloning Photoshop With AI Misses the Real Design Opportunity
AI makes copying pro tools cheap, but the bigger gap is focused tools that organise controls around the job people actually do.
Why Build a Smaller Tool Around the Work?
The author argues that cheap AI-assisted development has made cloning professional tools like Photoshop easy, yet the more valuable opportunity lies elsewhere. Instead of replicating a complex application, the piece suggests designers should ask which user tasks are poorly served and where people genuinely need creative control. It introduces the idea of overserved users, such as a marketer who makes occasional polished product videos and finds full editing suites excessive for the job.
For brand builders, the argument is a useful reminder that the strongest products often reduce the mental model rather than copy an incumbent. Tools like transcript-led audio and video editors show how controls organised around the work can feel simpler without losing precision. Product strategists, UX designers and anyone weighing a build-or-buy decision will find a clear framework here, and a sensible caution that new tools still need proper maintenance and support.
Source: uxdesign.cc · Originally published




